Car pics too cool not to share

I hastily posted that this was a legit Ford GT 40... It's a spot on replica by SuperPerformance. I've edited for accuracy .

I've been in and around a lot of big hp cars all my life. Never was a ride so brutal. Took a few tries to figure out how to get in and out of this thing and once you're buckled in to the slab of foam that's supposed to be a seat, it feels like you're in a coffin. 1966 Ford GT 40 Mk II replica. I have a few launch videos.. it was ballistic. The sound from straight piped power plant ten inches from your head was sensory rich. Cornering, at any speed, was a perfectly predictable and dead flat. This thing was made to drive all out for 24 hours.. '66 was the first year Ford finally took Ferrari in LaMans. Historic year.

It's for sale if anyones is interested.

Maybe the most fun ride I have ever experienced...

2024-05-11 1966 Ford GT 40 42.jpg


2024-05-11 1966 Ford GT 40 53.jpg


2024-05-11 1966 Ford GT 40 51.jpg


2024-05-11 1966 Ford GT 40 10.jpg


2024-05-11 1966 Ford GT 40 01.jpg



 
Last edited:
I've been in and around a lot of big hp cars all my life. Never was a ride so brutal. Took a few tries to figure out how to get in and out of this thing and once you're buckled in to the slab of foam that's supposed to be a seat, it feels like you're in a coffin. Legit 1966 Ford GT 40 Mk II. I have a few launch videos.. it was ballistic. The sound from straight piped power plant ten inches from your head was sensory rich. Cornering, at any speed, was a perfectly predictable and dead flat. This thing was made to drive all out for 24 hours.. '66 was the first year Ford finally took Ferrari in LaMans. Historic year.

It's for sale if anyones is interested.

Maybe the most fun ride I have ever experienced...

My Mount Rushmore of cars but I’d never fit comfortably.
 
Legit 1966 Ford GT 40 Mk II

Awesome car, I’ve never been in anything like it, I bet it's a blast. I'm a little confused though, you say it a legit '66 Ford GT40, but show a car with modern stuff and a build tag saying Superformance, LLC, who builds replicas. I assume it's a replica car built similar to the original. What engine is he running?
 
Awesome car, I’ve never been in anything like it, I bet it's a blast. I'm a little confused though, you say it a legit '66 Ford GT40, but show a car with modern stuff and a build tag saying Superformance, LLC, who builds replicas. I assume it's a replica car built similar to the original. What engine is he running?

I stand corrected... Maybe my ability to hear was impeded by either the sound of the exhaust or my tentacles being up somewhere around my throat. I remember asking him.. Prices for originals are upwards of a million bucks if not more.. he chuckled. Knowing that he also has a 427 Shelby Cobra, I guess didn't probe hard enough.

Indeed a Superformance replica. So.. my apologies for the misleading post. That said, it remains one of the most brutal, yet enjoyable drives I have ever had.

Should have done more research before making a false claim. Can't lie.. I was excited about the experience.

Screenshot 2024-05-18 at 16.34.56.png
 
Last edited:
Indeed a Superformance replica.

That means it's ok to hammer on it. You should buy invest in it and go hammer on it yourself. ;)

After all of these years in the old car world, I'm not sure if I have ever been around a real GT40 from the '60. I know I've only seen two true Cobras, both 427 cars and nowhere near as shiny as all the replicas driving around. I don't mind a replica as long as the owner isn't trying to pass it off as the real deal. A replica is probably more fun to own.
 
That means it's ok to hammer on it. You should buy invest in it and go hammer on it yourself. ;)

After all of these years in the old car world, I'm not sure if I have ever been around a real GT40 from the '60. I know I've only seen two true Cobras, both 427 cars and nowhere near as shiny as all the replicas driving around. I don't mind a replica as long as the owner isn't trying to pass it off as the real deal. A replica is probably more fun to own.

Years ago I saw a Corvette Grand Sport replica at a small show. The dude that owned it was really cool and said , " he had the money , and wanted something different to drive " . It was primitive no A/C or radio , but when he fired up the rumpity rump Injected 540 BBC that's all the music I would want !
93eca52fddb52862ba7e8dfa0a8f1b65.jpg
 
That means it's ok to hammer on it. You should buy invest in it and go hammer on it yourself. ;)

After all of these years in the old car world, I'm not sure if I have ever been around a real GT40 from the '60. I know I've only seen two true Cobras, both 427 cars and nowhere near as shiny as all the replicas driving around. I don't mind a replica as long as the owner isn't trying to pass it off as the real deal. A replica is probably more fun to own.
I thought I had the two holy grail cars under my belt. I was in the presence of (not in and certainly didn't drive) an original 427 Cobra. On the street, not at a show. With this GT 40 being a replica (damn good one) I have one less.

The GT 40 has a 427 small block
 
I haven't seen one myself. But after seeing photos they fall in the same camp as C2 Corvettes , I love the coupe , but the convertibles are just OK.View attachment 528217View attachment 528218

I absolutely agree. The "fun factor" of driving a convertible or roadster is hard to deny, but there are definitely cars out there where the aesthetics suffer in the drop-top form. At least, that's how I see it. Stylistically speaking, I almost always prefer a fastback to a convertible.
 
I absolutely agree. The "fun factor" of driving a convertible or roadster is hard to deny, but there are definitely cars out there where the aesthetics suffer in the drop-top form. At least, that's how I see it. Stylistically speaking, I almost always prefer a fastback to a convertible.

Let's not ignore the practical aspects of a hardtop, like not having to replace the top, being generally leak free, and not cooking your bacon on those hot summer days.

Convertibles and black leather on a hot day ;)

Then there are the leaks. My dads Vette with aging top was something like this, and new tops on those cars aren't much better. I remember going through automated car washes and having to chase the machine around with a towel on the inside trying to block the spray. But on those hot summer days, that would have been a good way to cool down those seats. :LOL:
1716213572286.png
 
Last edited:
Let's not ignore the practical aspects of a hardtop, like not having to replace the top, being generally leak free, and not cooking your bacon on those hot summer days.

Convertibles and black leather on a hot day ;)

Then there are the leaks. My dads Vette with aging top was something like this, and new tops on those cars aren't much better. I remember going through automated car washes and having to chase the machine around with a towel on the inside trying to block the spray. But on those hot summer days, that would have been a good way to cool down those seats. :LOL:
View attachment 528412

They're also not as structurally rigid. Cowl shake is a problem with most convertibles, as losing the hardtop roof was typically an afterthought to the initial design and construction. They tried to mitigate such problems by utilizing subframe connectors, torque boxes, thicker frame material, etc. If a 6-cylinder car can be affected by losing its roof, imagine what having a torquey big-block would do to it?

As for the driving experience, however, my favorite was driving with the top down at night. Nothing else like it. Or try driving one with the top down while it's snowing. I drove my '67 Coronet convertible (I also owned the hardtop I had mentioned earlier) with the top down during a heavy snow one year, just because I wanted to. My neighbor eventually asked me if the top mechanism even worked, as he'd seen the top down for so long, he figured it surely must've failed. :LOL: